@InProceedings{SilveiraJung:2017:EvKeEx,
author = "Silveira, Thiago Lopes Trugillo da and Jung, Cl{\'a}udio Rosito",
affiliation = "{Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Institute of
Informatics} and {Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul -
Institute of Informatics}",
title = "Evaluation of Keypoint Extraction and Matching for Pose Estimation
using Pairs of Spherical Images",
booktitle = "Proceedings...",
year = "2017",
editor = "Torchelsen, Rafael Piccin and Nascimento, Erickson Rangel do and
Panozzo, Daniele and Liu, Zicheng and Farias, Myl{\`e}ne and
Viera, Thales and Sacht, Leonardo and Ferreira, Nivan and Comba,
Jo{\~a}o Luiz Dihl and Hirata, Nina and Schiavon Porto, Marcelo
and Vital, Creto and Pagot, Christian Azambuja and Petronetto,
Fabiano and Clua, Esteban and Cardeal, Fl{\'a}vio",
organization = "Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images, 30. (SIBGRAPI)",
publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",
address = "Los Alamitos",
keywords = "spherical images, keypoint detection, pose estimation.",
abstract = "Keypoint extraction and matching has been widely studied by the
computer vision community, mostly focused on pinhole camera
models. In this paper we perform a comparative analysis of four
keypoint extraction algorithms applied to full spherical images,
particularly in the context of pose estimation. Two of the methods
chosen for the comparative study, namely A-KAZE and ASIFT, have
been designed considering a perspective camera model, but were
already applied in an omnidirectional structure from motion
pipeline, generating successful results in the literature. The
other two algorithms are properly adapted versions of the
traditional descriptors SIFT and ORB to the spherical domain,
subbed SSFIT and SPHORB. We conduct our tests on captures of
omnidirectional cameras, both synthetic and real, arbitrarily
translated and rotated with known ground-truth transformations.
The extracted keypoints are fed to the well-known 8-point
algorithm with RANSAC, allowing to estimate the relative camera
poses. These poses (translation vector and rotation matrix) are
then compared to the ground-truth transformation parameters,
generating the error metrics used in our analysis. Our results
indicated that spherical descriptors SSIFT and SPHORB did not
produce better results than planar descriptors A-KAZE and ASIFT in
the context of pose estimation, particularly in the evaluation
with real image pairs.",
conference-location = "Niter{\'o}i, RJ, Brazil",
conference-year = "17-20 Oct. 2017",
doi = "10.1109/SIBGRAPI.2017.56",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SIBGRAPI.2017.56",
language = "en",
ibi = "8JMKD3MGPAW/3PF36SS",
url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGPAW/3PF36SS",
targetfile = "application.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "2024, May 02"
}